Very interesting. There seems to be an underlying assumption here that there is always an "after." Is evolution eternal? Also time itself is relevant to the observer. I'm glad someone out there is actually thinking. Thanks.
I was sure you were headed for Tat Tvam Asi, You are it - that see's the unseen etc. But maybe where the mind is identical to the brain, the imaginal to the physical, there is nowhere else to go.
Very interesting. There seems to be an underlying assumption here that there is always an "after." Is evolution eternal? Also time itself is relevant to the observer. I'm glad someone out there is actually thinking. Thanks.
Good point. What comes after evolution? Maybe nothing, or maybe something that is utterly incomprehensible to us, like philosophy is to a chicken.
Someone who considered the "after" seriously was Asimov. For a good 10-15 minute read, see:
“The Last Question” by Isaac Asimov.
A network of minds is a pretty good definition of "god", isnt it?
I was sure you were headed for Tat Tvam Asi, You are it - that see's the unseen etc. But maybe where the mind is identical to the brain, the imaginal to the physical, there is nowhere else to go.